The
structure of the Spalding MFA brief residency workshop is worth talking about.
You may not ever attend a formal workshop but it’s easy to emulate the
procedure in your critique groups. Alabama’s own Hudson Strode, first professor
in the Southeast to have a novel accepted in lieu of a thesis used a similar
model. You would simply do this on a smaller scale. Each workshop has one or
two mentors, depending upon size of the group. Most critique groups have a
facilitator.
Louella
Bryant, author of several children’s books and more recently a creative nonfiction
work, While in Darkness There is Light:
Idealism and Tragedy on an Australian Commune, led our cross-genre
workshop. I already hold an MFA in Fiction and have two poetry chapbooks
published and one full-length poetry book, plus I’ve written two novels and a
collection of short stories in manuscript form, so it was logical for me to
study cnf, right? Well, what writer do you know who is logical? Of course,
there was no logic in it, no more logic than you’d find in the colors of a
tie-dyed shirt, except that I’ve had several personal essays published during
the past year, and it suits me to write short true pieces.
A few
weeks before the workshop, participants receive what is termed the worksheet.
It consists of 20-25 pages of work from each participant. These pages may not
be published work, nor should the work be brand new, but should be edited as
well as the writer can manage on his own. Each participant is required to read
and annotate the pages once, to read the pages a second and third time, and
finally to write at least one-half page of comments or suggestions about each
piece. This is the most thorough consideration of her work a writer could hope
for, except for the one-on-one she will receive from her mentor during the
remainder of the semester.
Sena
Jeter Naslund is the Director of the Spalding writing program, and she sets the
tone and philosophy of the workshop and teaching: be positive, be generous with
praise, yet, be objective with suggestions for improvement if you think improvement
is needed. On opening night of each residency she always says, “Your
competition is not in this room. It’s over in the library.” It is a known fact
that if you start a critique with a negative comment, the rest of what you say
will not be heard. It’s human nature. So the student whose work is last in the
worksheet is the first to start the critique and everyone chimes in with what
they perceive as the strengths of the piece. Following that are suggestions for
change. Finally, the author is allowed, not to argue his points, but to clarify
any huge misunderstandings or ask questions of the group.
That
final step in the one-hour critique is the weak point of most groups I’ve been
a part of. Authors, if given half a chance, will defend what they’ve written
and how they’ve written it until the group grows long in the tooth. That seems
so strange to me. In this case group members have paid good money to be in the
workshop so it behooves them to accept as much as they can and at least
consider the suggestions. A mentor at Spalding said it well, “Trust the
impulse, but question the suggestion.” As the author you are always free not to
do what is suggested to improve the work, but as the author you would be smart
to take a second look if more than one person is confused after reading the
same portion of your manuscript. It is always the author, and only the author,
who will know what kind of ointment to apply to the ailing lines. Sena told me
once that you should think of revision not only as cutting away material but
also as adding to the material. Clarification is good either way.
On
the last meeting day of the workshop, each participant is asked to revise one
page according to the suggestions given by the group. The digital world has
changed everything. Ellie had us post our revised pages into Dropbox so that we
could view them on our computers or iPhones with a code we were provided for
Wi-Fi while in Reid Hall. It was amazing to see how the other seven students
had incorporated our suggestions for change into their work, and what a
striking difference it made.
Next week, Kathleen will share some of her writing and special techniques to make your writing pop.
Mahala